Funny Games (2007)
Three Stars (out of five)
2007. Released by Warner Brothers Home Entertainment. Running time 122 minutes. Rated R for Language and violence. Has closed captions, and English Subtitles. DVD set has very basic special features, with no commentaries. discs.

Are we on the air? Huh? You sure Howard Stern started this way? Michael Haneke, the director of such films as XXX and Cache, remakes his original Funny Games for American audiences. This time, Naomi Watts and Tim Roth star as the hapless couple who go on a summer vacation to their lake house with their young son. Things couldn’t be going better as they settle in to enjoy their upscale vacation--that is, until an exceedingly polite young man, all dressed in fashionably white, shows up at the door and asks if Anna could give him some eggs. Anna (Watts), having seen him with their neighbors just a while ago, sees no harm in giving him some eggs--which he promptly breaks by dropping on the floor, creating an awkward situation for Anna.

Go ahead, punk, make my afternoon. Hmm, doesn't have the same ring to it.... And so begins the funny game--which is not so funny for Anna, George (Roth) and their son, who are all taken hostage by two charming young psychopaths, who are still very urbane and well-manned, even when they coldly make a bet with their hostages that they--the entire family--will all be dead by the next morning, just twelve hours from now. The set up is chilling; one of the big fears of many people is the home invasion, and the fact that these psychos manage to charm their way inside is even more insidious. But Haneke isn’t interested in merely recreating a Hitchcockian thriller, here.

They're out of white wine? From the moment that Paul, the lead psycho, begins to share knowing glances with the camera--with us, the viewer--there’s something far deeper going on here. And as the poor family’s torturous evening progresses, Paul even speaks directly to the camera, asking us at one point who we’re rooting for. And as if shattering the fourth wall wasn’t enough for Haneke, there’s a startling moment, in the film’s last third, where events are changed by a character using the TV/DVD remote. It becomes very clear that Haneke is mostly interested in not telling a straight-on story, but instead is trying to make a statement about violence in films, and the media, in general. And he’s using this story--which is initially very well done, and superbly acted by all involved--as a way to jerk the viewer around. "Are you truly rooting for this helpless family?" Haneke seems to asks. "Are you rooting enough for them to strike back at these sadistic sons of bitches? Well, shame on you!"

Go ahead, punk, make my afternoon. Hmm, doesn't have the same ring to it.... It appears to be Haneke’s view that all violence is reprehensible--including violence used in self defense against a pair of psychopaths, apparently. This is a somewhat ivory tower view of the world that I think is very unrealistic. No matter how you slice it, an innocent family being slowly victimized by a pair of gleeful monsters is terrible--and, like the original, the Funny Games remake is not an easy movie to watch because of this. If you’ve seen the original, and hated it, then you’ll already know enough to avoid this film. For those who haven’t seen Funny Games, and who are looking for a good thriller, please don’t subject yourself to this. Go rent a Hitchcock classic instead. --SF

Main Review Page | Suspense/Thriller Page |Email Me | Buy This DVD Here!

Also On Blu-Ray!